Thinking allowed

Last Sunday after Trinity: 26 October 2025

Read­ings: Joel 2.23–32; Psalm 65; 2 Timothy 4.6–8, 16–18; Luke 18.9–14

‘The tax-col­lect­or, stand­ing far off,
would not even look up to heaven,
but was beat­ing his breast and saying,
“God, be mer­ci­ful to me, a sinner!” ’

In the name of the Fath­er and of the Son and of the Holy Spir­it. Amen.

Back in the 1670s, when Charles II was king,
the heir to the throne was his broth­er James.
An Itali­an prin­cess, Mary of Modena,
was chosen to be his wife,
a Roman Cath­ol­ic, like James.
But it seems that the pope was opposed to the marriage,
so they sought the help of Car­din­al Barberini
and he per­suaded them to marry immediately.
It would be, he advised,
“less dif­fi­cult to obtain for­give­ness for it after it was done,
than per­mis­sion for doing it”.1

Car­din­al Barber­in­i’s advice
has become some­thing of a proverb,
espe­cially in recent years, has­n’t it?
It’s easi­er to ask for­give­ness (after the event)
than to get per­mis­sion (before).

And the tax col­lect­or in today’s gos­pel reading
cer­tainly seems to have his eye on for­give­ness, does­n’t he?

So what are we to make of this?

Jesus is telling a story about two characters,
one a Phar­isee, and the oth­er – a tax-collector.
Now if you’ve been hearing
bible read­ings and ser­mons for some time
you’ve prob­ably already got some ideas,
some preconceptions,
about Phar­isees, and about tax-col­lect­ors.

Phar­isees –
well, they’re always arguing with Jesus, aren’t they?
And full of them­selves and their strict rules.
And as for tax-collectors,
I sup­pose we know instinctively
that they’re not par­tic­u­larly nice people,
don’t we?
After all, who likes the taxman
even in our own society?
Most of us prob­ably think we pay
at least a bit too much tax,
and the taxman
– not to men­tion Chan­cel­lors of the Exchequer –
often seems to be try­ing to take a bit more.
(But per­haps I’ll leave a dis­cus­sion of
the Brit­ish tax sys­tem for anoth­er occasion!
Back to first-cen­tury Judea.)

We can see in the gospels
that Jesus does seem to have
some­thing of a soft spot for tax collectors.
We read about Levi or Matthew
being taken from the tax office to be a disciple,
and about little Zac­chaeus climb­ing a tree
to see and hear Jesus,
and then host­ing a ban­quet for him.

These are per­haps typical
of the atti­tudes we might bring
to a dis­cus­sion of this parable.
But they are not, I suggest,
what Jesus’s imme­di­ate hear­ers would have thought.
Most likely they would have con­sidered a Pharisee
to be a par­agon of virtue,
instruc­ted in the law,
the bib­lic­al law,
someone to be esteemed and copied.

And as for a tax-collector …
well, it wasn’t just that he took people’s money;
no, the real prob­lem with tax collectors
was that they were col­lab­or­at­ors,
col­lab­or­at­ors with the Romans,
the hated occupy­ing power.
If we think what the atti­tude was
to Nazi col­lab­or­at­ors dur­ing the War, say in France –
after the War many were lynched,
killed by the mob or executed by the state.
That per­haps gives us an idea
of what the Judeans and Galileans listen­ing to Jesus
might have thought about tax collectors!

And yet Jesus, in this parable,
says it is the tax col­lect­or who is closer to God.

Now, we’re com­ing towards the end
of a three-year cycle of bible readings
at our Sunday morn­ing services,
and over that three years we have heard
a lot of Jesus’s parables.
And one thing that comes across to me
is Jesus’s skill at using just a few words
to con­jure up in our imagination
a situ­ation and some characters –
and then to turn it all on its head
and shock his listen­ers with a sur­pris­ing outcome.
It’s one of his favour­ite devices,
a favour­ite way of teach­ing and telling stories.
And I’m sure he preached this way
in part to get his hear­ers to think for themselves.

And Jesus delights in chal­len­ging stereotypes,
both pos­it­ive ste­reo­types and neg­at­ive stereotypes.
So, a couple of weeks ago
we heard about the Samar­it­an leper,
a hated foreigner,
who was healed.
And in this read­ing today
it is the godly Phar­isee who is roundly criticised,
and the hated tax collector
of whom Jesus speaks approvingly.
You can almost hear people in the crowd
mut­ter­ing to one another
“What does he mean?
How can a tax col­lect­or, an enemy col­lab­or­at­or, be good?”

And if we look care­fully at the pas­sage in the gospel,
then one of the inter­est­ing things
is that actu­ally Jesus does not con­demn the Pharisee
for the things that he says he has done,
for his self-dis­cip­line and his charity.
He doesn’t con­demn the Phar­isee for that;
and nor does he con­done the tax collector
for what he has done either.
Now in almost the next epis­ode in Luke’s gospel,
we learn about anoth­er tax col­lect­or, Zacchaeus.
And Zac­chaeus, hear­ing Jesus’s teaching,
declares that he will return over­pay­ments with interest,
and give away half what he has to the poor.
But there is noth­ing like that here.
Jesus keeps this story
short, sharp and pointed.

Because today’s parable
is not primar­ily about
the eth­ics of either the Phar­isee or the tax collector,
but about their attitudes:
their atti­tudes to themselves,
their atti­tudes to others,
and their atti­tudes, above all, to God.

Per­haps one of the key words we heard
was when Jesus says that
the tax col­lect­or returned home … “jus­ti­fied”.
“Jus­ti­fied”.
What on earth is that about?
Well, “being jus­ti­fied” and “jus­ti­fic­a­tion”
are words that carry a lot of theo­lo­gic­al baggage.
They cause debate and divi­sion among Christians
and between sec­tions of the Church.
But ulti­mately it’s about being fit and worthy,
being made fit and worthy,
fit and worthy to stand in the pres­ence of the Almighty.

What Jesus seems to be saying
is that we do not earn that justification
by what we do.
Now, don’t get me wrong.
Else­where in the gospels,
Jesus spends a long time
teach­ing about right behaviour,
about caring for others,
about look­ing after the weak and the poor
and all who are in need,
regard­less of who they are
or where they have come from,
or soci­ety’s atti­tude towards them —
the poor, the hungry, the homeless,
the sick or disabled,
the pris­on­er, the refugee,
the oppressed and the shunned.

That work is very clearly a gos­pel imperative,
and Jesus makes it abund­antly clear
that in help­ing those in need
we are help­ing … Jesus,
we are help­ing … God.

Instead, in today’s reading,
Jesus reminds us
that in order to come close to God
we need to acknowledge
that we … are not gods,
that we … are not in con­trol of the world:
that we need to stop and to be honest.
To be hon­est with my-self.
To con­front my own faults, my own issues.

In the story,
the Phar­isee’s problem
is that rather than recog­nising his own faults,
he prefers to see him­self as bet­ter than someone else.
The tax col­lect­or, on the oth­er hand,
does not com­pare him­self to others,
but humbly recognises
that he has not done the right things.
And it is that recognition
which should be the start of a jour­ney for him,
and which should be the start of a jour­ney for each of us.
Per­haps the epis­ode of the tax col­lect­or Zacchaeus,
just a few verses later,
indic­ates what should fol­low that ini­tial recog­ni­tion of fault –
a whole new way of life
new life in the king­dom of God.

[short pause]

And a final thought or conundrum
for us to consider.
I won­der if you have spotted
the “Catch 22” in the parable.
Have you?
It’s all too easy, isn’t it,
to find ourselves thinking
“I thank you that I am not like … that Pharisee”?
Because when we do that
then we are being just like the Phar­isee in the par­able, aren’t we?

“God, be mer­ci­ful to me, a sinner!”

  1. Lives of the Queens of Eng­land, by Agnes Strick­land, vol 9, 1846, p.39, where it is ascribed to the Earl of Peterborough’s account of the nego­ti­ations, in which he was the chief nego­ti­at­or for James.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *