I’ve been ringing Cambridge Surprise for quite a few years now. I began with Minor (in 2005), learning the various pieces of work by rote. Then when I could do that I moved on to Major (in 2006), again, learning by rote the bits that were different from Minor. Then I got to the point that I could barely remember how to ring Minor, because I always forgot which bits of Major to leave out. I’ve got over that too, and recently have begun to ring Minor a bit more, because we have ringers who have moved on to learning it.
All of which sparked an interest in learning Cambridge Surprise Royal, i.e. on 10 bells. (Ringing it would be a rather different matter as I’m not a ten-bell ringer, and although I have rung Caters a handful of times, I’ve never rung Royal. But I want to stick with the theory for a bit.)
So I looked up the blue line for Cambridge Surprise Royal, and in searching for it I came instead across descriptions of Cambridge, and I realized I had been missing something about Cambridge all these years. The sort of thing that makes me wonder whether I could have learnt the method in a much better way — rather than learning sections by rote, and then re-learning it by place bells, instead learning it and ringing it from first principles. Because the principle behind Cambridge, on any number of bells, is quite simple.
Here it is:
What do we mean by treble-bob hunting “out of phase”, and what are the consequences of this?
By treble-bob hunting “out of phase” we mean that when the treble dodges the other bells plain hunt, and when the treble plain hunts the other bells dodge. Like this:
1-x-----
-1-x----
1---x---
-1---x--
--1-x---
---1-x--
--1---x-
---1---x
All dodges for all bells are confined to “dodging positions” 1–2, 3–4, 5–6 etc, and never in say 2–3 or 4–5. And all dodges are at backstroke.
The variations from treble-bob hunting, if you’re not on the front or at the back, are simple too:
-1---x
1---x-
1----x
-1--x-
1--x--
-1x---
meet the treble before dodging, so plain hunt through
-x1---
x--1--
1---vx--
dodging with another bell, v-1--xv--
--1-vx--
---1xv--
meet the treble after dodging …--1-x---
so make places (far to wait for the treble …---1-x--
----1x--
----x1--
----1x--
… and dodge with it----x1--
----x-1-
and make places again to wait for another bell …-----x-1
----yx1-
----xy-1
----yx-1
… and dodge with the other bell, yThis will work provided you aren’t at the front or back. It has to be modified there because there is nowhere for another bell to go to or come from:
vx----
treble-bobbing, dodge down with bell vxv----
vx----
xvy---
leadxyv---
yx----
still treble-bobbing, dodge up with bell yxy-1--
yx1---
meet the treble after dodging …yx-1--
… so make places to wait for the treble …xy1---
x1y---
1x----
x1----
… and dodge with it1x----
1x----
lead end, so make 2nd place over the treble and become the 2nd place bell
So the only time you really have to do anything different is when you meet the treble at the back.
-----x
1----x
lie and dodge down-1--x-
--1--x
---1x-
meet the treble after dodging …--1--x
… so add another dodge …---1x-
---x1-
… and pass the treble--x--1
-x--1-
x----1
-x----
x-----
x----1
-x--1-
--x--1
---x1-
meet the treble before dodging …---1x-
--1--x
… so pass through …---1x-
--1--x
-1--x-
… and double dodge to compensate1----x
-1---x
1---x-
1----x
----x-
1-x---
-1-x--
1---x-
treble-bobbing up; the treble is coming up to the back after you …-1---x
--1-x-
---1-x
--1-x-
… so add an extra dodge to wait for the treble---1-x
… lie, and …----1x
----x1
----1x
… dodge down with the treble----x1
----x1
half-lead, so make (n‑1)th place …----1x
----x1
… and dodge back up with the treble …----1x
---1-x
… lie, and …--1-x-
---1-x
… double-dodge down to get back in phase …--1-x-
-1---x
1---x-
-1-x--
… and resume treble-bobbing down1-x---
1--x--
And that is all there is to Cambridge Surprise on any number of bells.
(With acknowledgement to Changeringing Wiki.)
Hi Simon,
It’s great to find you blogging about approaches to memorising and ringing methods. No point everyone re-inventing the wheel on this problem.
Like you, I am trying to dig down into Surprise Methods and come up with something fundamental to understand, rather than an ever-growing list of blue lines to memorise and, inevitably, to muddle up.
I’m trying to find new ways to memorise, and focusing on Superlative. Fascinating to read your post on the first efforts with Superlative – moments of muddle, trying to find where you are, “[hanging] around in 5–6 trying to work out just where I should be”.. I have had so many of those moments!
So is there a way of learning a new method that enables us to actually just stand up and *ring* it, and at least to be confident that we won’t be the first to go wrong? And to be able to then re-ring a method we memorised 6 months ago without forgetting key dodges or places? I wouldn’t mind if it took several weeks to really master a method this way before I could ring it – it would just be nice not to have a habit of messing things up the first dozen times I ring them (or several dozen, if I am honest!)
I think this is something of a Holy Grail, for many of us.
Kind Regards etc.