Thinking allowed

Last Sunday after Trinity: 26 October 2025

Read­ings: Joel 2.23–32; Psalm 65; 2 Timothy 4.6–8, 16–18; Luke 18.9–14

‘The tax-col­lect­or, stand­ing far off,
would not even look up to heaven,
but was beat­ing his breast and saying,
“God, be mer­ci­ful to me, a sinner!” ’

In the name of the Fath­er and of the Son and of the Holy Spir­it. Amen.

Back in the 1670s, when Charles II was king,
the heir to the throne was his broth­er James.
An Itali­an prin­cess, Mary of Modena,
was chosen to be his wife,
a Roman Cath­ol­ic, like James.
But it seems that the pope was opposed to the marriage,
so they sought the help of Car­din­al Barberini
and he per­suaded them to marry immediately.
It would be, he advised,
“less dif­fi­cult to obtain for­give­ness for it after it was done,
than per­mis­sion for doing it”.1

Car­din­al Barber­in­i’s advice
has become some­thing of a proverb,
espe­cially in recent years, has­n’t it?
It’s easi­er to ask for­give­ness (after the event)
than to get per­mis­sion (before).

And the tax col­lect­or in today’s gos­pel reading
cer­tainly seems to have his eye on for­give­ness, does­n’t he?

So what are we to make of this?

Jesus is telling a story about two characters,
one a Phar­isee, and the oth­er – a tax-collector.
Now if you’ve been hearing
bible read­ings and ser­mons for some time
you’ve prob­ably already got some ideas,
some preconceptions,
about Phar­isees, and about tax-col­lect­ors.

Phar­isees –
well, they’re always arguing with Jesus, aren’t they?
And full of them­selves and their strict rules.
And as for tax-collectors,
I sup­pose we know instinctively
that they’re not par­tic­u­larly nice people,
don’t we?
After all, who likes the taxman
even in our own society?
Most of us prob­ably think we pay
at least a bit too much tax,
and the taxman
– not to men­tion Chan­cel­lors of the Exchequer –
often seems to be try­ing to take a bit more.
(But per­haps I’ll leave a dis­cus­sion of
the Brit­ish tax sys­tem for anoth­er occasion!
Back to first-cen­tury Judea.)

We can see in the gospels
that Jesus does seem to have
some­thing of a soft spot for tax collectors.
We read about Levi or Matthew
being taken from the tax office to be a disciple,
and about little Zac­chaeus climb­ing a tree
to see and hear Jesus,
and then host­ing a ban­quet for him.

These are per­haps typical
of the atti­tudes we might bring
to a dis­cus­sion of this parable.
But they are not, I suggest,
what Jesus’s imme­di­ate hear­ers would have thought.
Most likely they would have con­sidered a Pharisee
to be a par­agon of virtue,
instruc­ted in the law,
the bib­lic­al law,
someone to be esteemed and copied.

And as for a tax-collector …
well, it wasn’t just that he took people’s money;
no, the real prob­lem with tax collectors
was that they were col­lab­or­at­ors,
col­lab­or­at­ors with the Romans,
the hated occupy­ing power.
If we think what the atti­tude was
to Nazi col­lab­or­at­ors dur­ing the War, say in France –
after the War many were lynched,
killed by the mob or executed by the state.
That per­haps gives us an idea
of what the Judeans and Galileans listen­ing to Jesus
might have thought about tax collectors!

And yet Jesus, in this parable,
says it is the tax col­lect­or who is closer to God.

Now, we’re com­ing towards the end
of a three-year cycle of bible readings
at our Sunday morn­ing services,
and over that three years we have heard
a lot of Jesus’s parables.
And one thing that comes across to me
is Jesus’s skill at using just a few words
to con­jure up in our imagination
a situ­ation and some characters –
and then to turn it all on its head
and shock his listen­ers with a sur­pris­ing outcome.
It’s one of his favour­ite devices,
a favour­ite way of teach­ing and telling stories.
And I’m sure he preached this way
in part to get his hear­ers to think for themselves.

And Jesus delights in chal­len­ging stereotypes,
both pos­it­ive ste­reo­types and neg­at­ive stereotypes.
So, a couple of weeks ago
we heard about the Samar­it­an leper,
a hated foreigner,
who was healed.
And in this read­ing today
it is the godly Phar­isee who is roundly criticised,
and the hated tax collector
of whom Jesus speaks approvingly.
You can almost hear people in the crowd
mut­ter­ing to one another
“What does he mean?
How can a tax col­lect­or, an enemy col­lab­or­at­or, be good?”

And if we look care­fully at the pas­sage in the gospel,
then one of the inter­est­ing things
is that actu­ally Jesus does not con­demn the Pharisee
for the things that he says he has done,
for his self-dis­cip­line and his charity.
He doesn’t con­demn the Phar­isee for that;
and nor does he con­done the tax collector
for what he has done either.
Now in almost the next epis­ode in Luke’s gospel,
we learn about anoth­er tax col­lect­or, Zacchaeus.
And Zac­chaeus, hear­ing Jesus’s teaching,
declares that he will return over­pay­ments with interest,
and give away half what he has to the poor.
But there is noth­ing like that here.
Jesus keeps this story
short, sharp and pointed.

Because today’s parable
is not primar­ily about
the eth­ics of either the Phar­isee or the tax collector,
but about their attitudes:
their atti­tudes to themselves,
their atti­tudes to others,
and their atti­tudes, above all, to God.

Per­haps one of the key words we heard
was when Jesus says that
the tax col­lect­or returned home … “jus­ti­fied”.
“Jus­ti­fied”.
What on earth is that about?
Well, “being jus­ti­fied” and “jus­ti­fic­a­tion”
are words that carry a lot of theo­lo­gic­al baggage.
They cause debate and divi­sion among Christians
and between sec­tions of the Church.
But ulti­mately it’s about being fit and worthy,
being made fit and worthy,
fit and worthy to stand in the pres­ence of the Almighty.

What Jesus seems to be saying
is that we do not earn that justification
by what we do.
Now, don’t get me wrong.
Else­where in the gospels,
Jesus spends a long time
teach­ing about right behaviour,
about caring for others,
about look­ing after the weak and the poor
and all who are in need,
regard­less of who they are
or where they have come from,
or soci­ety’s atti­tude towards them —
the poor, the hungry, the homeless,
the sick or disabled,
the pris­on­er, the refugee,
the oppressed and the shunned.

That work is very clearly a gos­pel imperative,
and Jesus makes it abund­antly clear
that in help­ing those in need
we are help­ing … Jesus,
we are help­ing … God.

Instead, in today’s reading,
Jesus reminds us
that in order to come close to God
we need to acknowledge
that we … are not gods,
that we … are not in con­trol of the world:
that we need to stop and to be honest.
To be hon­est with my-self.
To con­front my own faults, my own issues.

In the story,
the Phar­isee’s problem
is that rather than recog­nising his own faults,
he prefers to see him­self as bet­ter than someone else.
The tax col­lect­or, on the oth­er hand,
does not com­pare him­self to others,
but humbly recognises
that he has not done the right things.
And it is that recognition
which should be the start of a jour­ney for him,
and which should be the start of a jour­ney for each of us.
Per­haps the epis­ode of the tax col­lect­or Zacchaeus,
just a few verses later,
indic­ates what should fol­low that ini­tial recog­ni­tion of fault –
a whole new way of life
new life in the king­dom of God.

[short pause]

And a final thought or conundrum
for us to consider.
I won­der if you have spotted
the “Catch 22” in the parable.
Have you?
It’s all too easy, isn’t it,
to find ourselves thinking
“I thank you that I am not like … that Pharisee”?
Because when we do that
then we are being just like the Phar­isee in the par­able, aren’t we?

“God, be mer­ci­ful to me, a sinner!”

0 Comments

Trinity 16: 5 October 2025

Read­ings: Lam­ent­a­tions 1.1–6; Psalm 137; 2 Timothy 1.1–14; Luke 17.5–10.

In the name of the Fath­er and of the Son and of the Holy Spir­it. Amen.

“We are worth­less slaves;
we have done only what we ought to have done!”
Some words from Jesus in the gos­pel read­ing we have just heard.

Well I was in Lon­don dur­ing the week,
and I happened to be walk­ing from
West­min­ster Abbey to Lam­beth Palace,
when I spot­ted an inter­est­ing monument
on the Embank­ment at Millbank
that I’d nev­er noticed before.
It’s a 19th-cen­tury fountain,
a big covered drink­ing fountain,
dec­or­ated with poly­chro­mat­ic brick or stone,
and it’s called, as I discovered,
the Bux­ton Memorial.

The Bux­ton Memori­al Foun­tain
[pic­ture: Simon Ker­shaw Octo­ber 2025]

It com­mem­or­ates a num­ber of Mem­bers of Parliament
who led the 19th-cen­tury campaigns
first
to abol­ish the slave trade
and then
to abol­ish slavery itself.

And our gos­pel read­ing today
presents us with an “inter­est­ing” situation,
don’t you agree?
In that second half, Jesus talks about slaves,
and per­haps you found it a bit uncomfortable.

So, hands up if the idea of slavery
makes you uncomfortable –
the idea … of being a slave,
the idea … of own­ing slaves,
the idea … of trad­ing slaves.
Slaves – that’s … oth­er human beings.

Most of us here – with a few exceptions –
prob­ably don’t con­sider ourselves
to have any dir­ect link with slavery –
we aren’t des­cen­ded from slaves,
and we prob­ably aren’t descended
from slave-own­ers either,
though of course
we might still have benefitted
from insti­tu­tions and investments
that derive from slavery.

I guess there are one or two excep­tions among us,
and plenty of oth­ers in our town
and else­where around us,
and we can­’t talk about slavery
without being sens­it­ive to that
and to the impact it has had
on our friends and their families.
I’m sure that that per­son­al stake makes a difference
to how today’s gos­pel read­ing is heard,
and speak­ing for myself
per­haps I find it too easy
not to worry that much about it.

Nor should we for­get that there are people in this country,
prob­ably people here in St Ives,
who are involved in “mod­ern slavery”:
people who are exploited and kept in bondage;
people who exploit oth­ers and keep them in bondage.

Hav­ing said all that, however,
I want to make two quick points – about Jesus.
First, let’s be abso­lutely clear:
there is no indic­a­tion at all
from any­thing we read in the New Testament
that Jesus or his family
or any of his imme­di­ate associates
ever owned slaves.
There are no slaves at his birth in Bethlehem,
and no slaves tend­ing to him in the gospels.
When Jesus vis­its his friends Mary and Martha,
it is fam­ously Martha
who is busy with domest­ic chores,
not a slave.

And the second point
is that Jesus isn’t set­ting out
to over­turn the insti­tu­tion of slavery
as it exis­ted in the ancient Medi­ter­ranean world –
not in the short term anyway.
That was for later generations –
though he clearly envisaged
a dif­fer­ent way of treat­ing everyone,
regard­less of wheth­er they were slave or free.

So what are we to make of all this?

Well yes­ter­day
I was licensed by the bishop
to be a lay reader,
a licensed lay minister
in this parish.
And being a min­is­ter is also about being a servant.
You see, the word min­is­ter comes to us from Latin
and its first use was in the second century
to refer to dea­cons.

That’s because the word dea­con
comes from the Greek word διάκονος2,
which simply means “ser­vant”,
per­haps espe­cially someone
who waits at table.
It wasn’t long before “min­is­ter”
came to be used of all clergy –
not just dea­cons, but priests and bish­ops too,
(even archbishops-designate)
and also of the less­er orders
such as sub-dea­cons and readers,
all of whom are servants …
ser­vants of God.

And Jesus makes this point sev­er­al times, doesn’t he?
In one of the week­day readings
from Morn­ing Pray­er last week,3
Jesus reminds his disciples
that the rulers of the Gentiles
lord it over them
and that the great ones of the Gen­tiles are tyrants.
But his dis­ciples, Jesus says,
his dis­ciples are to be ser­vants;
and he mixes the lan­guage of ser­vants and slaves
say­ing that
“who­ever wishes to become great among you
must be your ser­vant4,
and who­ever wishes to be first among you
must be slave5 of all”.6

This same story appears also in Luke’s gos­pel7
only there it has an extra punchline –
“who is great­er,” asks Jesus,
“the one who is at the table
or the one who serves?
Is it not,” Jesus says, “is it not the one at the table?
But I,” he answers him­self, “I
am among you as one who serves”.
And there’s a ver­sion in John’s gos­pel too8.
There Jesus concludes
by telling the disciples
that just as he has served them,
they are to serve one another.

Just as he has served them,
they are to serve one another.

So let’s come back
to the words in today’s gos­pel reading:
“We are worth­less slaves;
we have done only what we ought to have done!”
In our context,
in the twenty-first century,
we might well see Jesus’s words
as a little harsh,
and for some
a pain­ful reminder
of the slave trade.

But let’s para­phrase those words a bit;
how about this?
“Our role as Christians,
as fol­low­ers of Jesus and his teaching,
our role is to serve others,
to look after others,
to help others.
That’s what God asks us to do.”

We may be able to serve a lot;
or we may only have the capa­city at the moment
to serve a little;
or maybe right now
we are among the ones who need to be served.

But it is this humble ser­vice to others
which is at the heart of Jesus’s message
of com­pas­sion and recon­cili­ation.
It is the role of ordained ministers
(even of an archbishop-designate);
it is the role of licensed lay ministers;
it is the role of all of us who hear the words of Jesus.
To serve … God;
to serve … each other;
to serve … the whole of creation.

Because we stand today at a crossroads.
Of course, we stand each day at a crossroads,
the junc­tion between the past and the future;
the past behind us,
known, or partly known;
the future before us, largely unknown.
For me, right now,
that cross­roads is defined by
my licens­ing yes­ter­day in the Cathedral,
my licens­ing as a lay minister
to serve in this parish.
But we each of us stand at a crossroads.
We don’t know what the future will bring,
indi­vidu­ally or collectively,
for us or for our parish.
But what we do know is that
every day
Jesus calls us, each one of us,
to serve.
To serve one another,
to serve our community,
to serve the world.

So, finally once again:
“We are worth­less slaves;
we have done only what we ought to have done!”

Now Jesus is prone to hyperbole.
He loves to exag­ger­ate for effect,
to grab attention.
And we can see that here.
Some­times we need sup­port and affirmation.
At oth­er times we need tak­ing down
a peg or two.
(Well I do anyway.)
But Jesus’s mes­sage is
a call to serve.
I am, he says, among you as one who serves.

So in the days ahead
I invite you
to take a few moments to think about
what you can do to serve;
what we as fol­low­ers of Jesus
indi­vidu­ally and collectively
can do to serve:
to serve God’s world
and to serve God’s people,
to serve them here in St Ives.

Amen.

Note: at the end of this ser­vice it was announced that the Vicar would be leav­ing in Janu­ary. Some of the “unknown future” text was writ­ten with this in mind.

 

0 Comments